Now showing items 1-1 of 1
| Abstract: | The nature and extent of protection secured to personal liberty has been a subject matter of great controversy and debate. The expression "procedure established by law" as a standard of protection for personal liberty has been looked upon as highly unsatisfactory and inadequate. For, unlike the specific attributes of liberty that are separately guaranteed under Art.19, ‘personal liberty‘ as guaranteed by Art.21 does not obligate the .Legislature to comply with the requirements of justice and reasonableness as and when it enchroaches upon that right. Though the concept of ‘personal liberty‘ has received an evolutive and expansive meaning through judicial process, the standard of protection which the judicial process could secure to personal liberty through the interpretation of Art.21 has been far from satisfactory Even after four decades of judicial process in the interpretation of Art.21 the problem of evolving a just and adequate standard of protection for personal liberty in that Article continues to be 21 crucial constitutional issue, craving for a. satisfactory solution. And the present study is a humble attempt to unravel this problem and to Search for a reasonable solution. |
| Description: | Department of Law, Cochin University of Science and Technology |
| URI: | http://dyuthi.cusat.ac.in/purl/3762 |
| Files | Size |
|---|---|
| Dyuthi-T1724.pdf | (18.08Mb) |
Now showing items 1-1 of 1
Dyuthi Digital Repository Copyright © 2007-2011 Cochin University of Science and Technology. Items in Dyuthi are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.