DSpace About DSpace Software
 

Dyuthi @ CUSAT >
Ph.D THESES >
Faculty of Law >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://purl.org/purl/3062

Title: Judicial Creativity in Constitutional Interpretation
Authors: Jayadevan, V R
Dr.Chandrasekharan, N S
Keywords: Judiciary
HigherJudiciary
High Court
LowerJudiciary
The Indian High Courts Act 1911, 1 & 2 Geo. V. c. 18.
Judicial independence
Issue Date: 17-Aug-1999
Publisher: Cochin University of Science and Technology
Abstract: The focus of study in this thesis is on the necessity and extent of judicial creativity in interpreting provisions in certain crucial areas in the Constitution of India. Judicial innovation was essential to adapt the constitutional provisions to modern changed context. Creativity of the Court has been mainly in the creation and introduction of certain new concepts not found in any specific provision of the Constitution which, but were essential for its meaningful interpretation.Independence of the judiciary, basic structure and certain elements of social justice cherished as ideal by the makers of the Constitution are some such concepts infused into the Constitution by the judiciary. The second aspect of creativity lies in the attempt of the Court to construe provisions in the Constitution with a view to upholding and maintaining the concepts so infused into the Constitution. Introduction of those concepts into the Constitution was necessary and is justified. all important features of the Constitution like democratic form of government, federal structure, judicial review, independence of judiciary and rule of law were thus included in the doctrine to prevent their alteration by amendments.As a result of such a construction, the nature of those directive principles itself has changed. They ceased to be mere directives for state action but became mandate for it. If left to legislative or executive will for their implementation, the directives would have remained enforceable as ordinary right.To conclude, notwithstanding the errors committed by the Supreme Court in construing the provisions in the above areas, they stand testimony to its creative and innovative response in interpreting the Constitution. If this trend is continued, it will be possible to achieve through the judicial process, maintenance of independence of the judiciary, avoidance of destruction of the Constitution through the process of amendment and realisation of social justice envisaged in the directive principles. It can be hoped that the Court would maintain its energetic and vibrant mind and rise up to the occasions and extend the same to other areas in future.
Description: School of Legal Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology.
URI: http://dyuthi.cusat.ac.in/purl/3062
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Law

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Dyuthi-T1036.pdfPdF7.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback