PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CLASSIFIERS IN SPEECH RECOGNITION

Dyuthi/Manakin Repository

PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CLASSIFIERS IN SPEECH RECOGNITION

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Poulose Jacob,K
dc.contributor.author Sonia, Sunny
dc.contributor.author David, Peter S
dc.date.accessioned 2014-06-13T06:05:36Z
dc.date.available 2014-06-13T06:05:36Z
dc.date.issued 2013-04
dc.identifier.issn 2319 - 1163
dc.identifier.uri http://dyuthi.cusat.ac.in/purl/3914
dc.description IJRET | APR 2013 Volume: 2 Issue: 4,590 - 597 en_US
dc.description.abstract Speech is the most natural means of communication among human beings and speech processing and recognition are intensive areas of research for the last five decades. Since speech recognition is a pattern recognition problem, classification is an important part of any speech recognition system. In this work, a speech recognition system is developed for recognizing speaker independent spoken digits in Malayalam. Voice signals are sampled directly from the microphone. The proposed method is implemented for 1000 speakers uttering 10 digits each. Since the speech signals are affected by background noise, the signals are tuned by removing the noise from it using wavelet denoising method based on Soft Thresholding. Here, the features from the signals are extracted using Discrete Wavelet Transforms (DWT) because they are well suitable for processing non-stationary signals like speech. This is due to their multi- resolutional, multi-scale analysis characteristics. Speech recognition is a multiclass classification problem. So, the feature vector set obtained are classified using three classifiers namely, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Naive Bayes classifiers which are capable of handling multiclasses. During classification stage, the input feature vector data is trained using information relating to known patterns and then they are tested using the test data set. The performances of all these classifiers are evaluated based on recognition accuracy. All the three methods produced good recognition accuracy. DWT and ANN produced a recognition accuracy of 89%, SVM and DWT combination produced an accuracy of 86.6% and Naive Bayes and DWT combination produced an accuracy of 83.5%. ANN is found to be better among the three methods. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Cochin University of Science & Technology en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher IJRET en_US
dc.subject Speech Recognition en_US
dc.subject Soft Thresholding en_US
dc.subject Discrete Wavelet Transforms en_US
dc.subject Artificial Neural Networks en_US
dc.subject Support Vector Machines and Naive Bayes Classifier en_US
dc.title PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CLASSIFIERS IN SPEECH RECOGNITION en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
PERFORMANCE OF ... IN SPEECH RECOGNITION.pdf 433.1Kb PDF View/Open PdF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Dyuthi


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account